Capitalism 2 lets you build the empire of your dreams! You become a corporate CEO and face real-world challenges as you build a business empire!

It's a comprehensive business simulation that gives you the power to manipulate the free market, with complex business strategies that might make you millions! Choose from over 60 product types to manufacture and market, as you hire and fire upper management positions! It's time to try your hand in the corporate world with Capitalism 2!

Supreme Ruler: Cold War (PC) ISO Download Completo Enviar por e-mailBlogThis! Capitalism II (PC) *PT-BR* Portable Download Completo Enviar por. Play the strategy game of money, power and wealth. Monitor your business performance against competitors, plot your strategy, even engineer hostile.

Game belongs to genres: Full version features: • Build Your Dream Empire! • Play Capitalist Or Entrepreneur Campaign! • More Than 60 Products To Choose From! • Many Business Strategies!

I think the kind of government Kamukaze is talking about is a democratic socialism, like they have in some European countries. They seem to work very good, in my opinion. Communism doesn't work because they've all been initiated in poor countries. Karl Marx himself said that Communism is the next form of government after Capitalism; he said that a country needed to be Capitalist for a while to build up a good amount of wealth, and then it should be communist because there was enough wealth to be redistributed so everyone has enough money to live comfortably. In these countries like Cuba, China, and Russia, the countries were already poor so the only thing they redistributed was hunger, poverty, and sorrow. On the other hand, if you don't care about loss of human life, Stalinism was probably one of the most efficient governments in the modern age.

They brought Russia up from fucking dirt into a superpower by the time of the Cold War. Of course, they killed more of their own people than Hitler killed anyone, so you have to take that into account. Political discussion: It is my belief that brief, several word descriptions of societal models (like 'communism', 'democratic socialism', 'constitutional monarchy', etc) should not be compared as, all too often, we're judging them based on the manufactured image of these systems which, far too often, has very little resemblance to how these systems actually work in each state. For example, many people consider the United States to be a democracy (and there are many other, more specific terms). Yet the only (official) way most Americans participate in governing their state(s)/nation is by voting.